Blunder Dome Sighting  
privacy 
 
 
 

Hangout for experimental confirmation and demonstration of software, computing, and networking. The exercises don't always work out. The professor is a bumbler and the laboratory assistant is a skanky dufus.



Click for Blog Feed
Blog Feed

Recent Items
 
Removing Complexity Makes Less Better
 
Your Computer Is Insecure. Bad planning, eh?
 
Certification of Network-Attached Components?
 
Reputation and Community Trust of Download Files
 
The PITAS from PITAC And the Emperor's Security Cl...
 
Collaborative Development Spurs Open-Source Arrang...
 
Identifying Key Elements of Safety-Critical Softwa...
 
CVSS: Common Vulnerability Scoring System
 
Open-Source License Simplification (and Trust?)
 
Identity, Authentication, and Attestation Together...

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?
  

Locations of visitors to this site
visits to Orcmid's Lair pages

The nfoCentrale Blog Conclave
 
Millennia Antica: The Kiln Sitter's Diary
 
nfoWorks: Pursuing Harmony
 
Numbering Peano
 
Orcmid's Lair
 
Orcmid's Live Hideout
 
Prof. von Clueless in the Blunder Dome
 
Spanner Wingnut's Muddleware Lab (experimental)

nfoCentrale Associated Sites
 
DMA: The Document Management Alliance
 
DMware: Document Management Interoperability Exchange
 
Millennia Antica Pottery
 
The Miser Project
 
nfoCentrale: the Anchor Site
 
nfoWare: Information Processing Technology
 
nfoWorks: Tools for Document Interoperability
 
NuovoDoc: Design for Document System Interoperability
 
ODMA Interoperability Exchange
 
Orcmid's Lair
 
TROST: Open-System Trustworthiness

2005-03-22

 

More Open Than Open

More Open Than Open.  [From 2005-03-15-01:30 pst] Here's a find by Scoble on the different ways of looking at open as in open-source software.  There are some interesting thoughts on different styles of licensing, especially with regard to restrictions and reciprocity condition (as in GPL and also in licenses where Microsoft might have patents that are applicable, etc.). I think I am tired, so this didn't land all that great with me. I'll give it another look.
[Added 2005-03-22-10:36 pst] Well, I'm still tired. The article provides a nice discussion of open-licensing based on needs of reciprocity.  I think it is a little defensive about some of the licenses used in the Microsoft Shared-Source initiative not all fitting under the Open Source Definition.  It is a valuable discussion. There's a little bit of "ick" in my reaction here.  I looked over at my bookshelf and it all came back to me.  My experience in purchasing the Stutz, Neward & Shilling Shared Source CLI Essentials actually left me feeling a little dirty and very curious (well, betrayed might be a better term) about O'Reilly letting that pass through their hands.  Initially, I was excited to see the book appear and eager to learn more about how the CLI run-time works.  Then, as I started reading all of the rules and license conditions on the CD-ROM, I stopped myself.  I really don't want to learn something that I can't safely and simply use in any level of my activities.  So to avoid falling afoul of the IP constraints, I am not using the CD.  I should probably destroy it, but it's too late.  I have the book and I have the CD, even though I regret ever breaking the seal.  Now I just get to feel dirtied by having it in my possession. Meanwhile, I will learn what there is to learn about CLI by sticking with the ECMA documents and the outpourings of the Mono Project.

 
Construction Structure (Hard Hat Area) You are navigating Orcmid's Lair.

template created 2004-06-17-20:01 -0700 (pdt) by orcmid
$$Author: Orcmid $
$$Date: 10-04-30 22:33 $
$$Revision: 21 $