![]() |
Professor von Clueless in the Blunder Dome |
status privacy contact |
|
Hangout for experimental confirmation and demonstration of software, computing, and networking. The exercises don't always work out. The professor is a bumbler and the laboratory assistant is a skanky dufus.
Atom Feed Associated Blogs Recent Items Archives |
Sunday, December 12, 2004The Difference an Open Source Makes
O'Reilly Weblogs: Kevin Shockey -- Open Source makes a difference. I subscribe to the Feed for the O'Reilly network and from time to time I go look at an article based on the short teasers that appear in the feeds. Kevin Shockey's topic drew my attention, but I couldn't figure out what I was looking at. Kevin is an emerging high technology entrepreneur. After spending 16 years in corporate software development and project management, he now leads an open source project funded with someone else's money. When he's not reading, writing, or dreaming he likes to spend time enjoying his family. His vision is to share his passion, mental agility, intuition, and challenge of authority to build an open future full of opportunity.Enactment of the vision is illustrated by Kevin's choosing to work toward the development of a high-tech economy in Puerto Rico. I can see how that fits an "open future full of opportunity" and also the housing of SNAP at the Interamerican University of Puerto Rico. And yet I'm uncomfortable with automatic association of undertaking an open-source project with the fulfilment of some vision for making a difference. I can see that it is that way for Kevin (but notice that the difference he sees is about much more than open-source development and I assume that other vehicles would be acceptable). I don't see how open-source as an activity is inherently making a difference, granting that there are many paths to contribution and finding a purpose. For me this is some kind of ideological collapse. In a near-immediate exchange on the comments for his entry, Kevin spells out how he sees it. I get that. I can get how being a good parent makes a difference. I can get how many small things make a difference every day. I get that open-source development is a way to make a contribution, and that can make a difference. There's an edge to it that goes too far for me. I don't want to smother Kevin's inspiration in a blanket of non-possibility, so I'm going to stop this and think off-line about whatever I'm attached to that has me stumble so awkwardly on this expression of making a difference.
Comments: Post a Comment Grounding Your Work's Usability
Jared Spool: Three Important Benefits of Personas. Here's a valuable essay on the successful use of personas (made-up users or virtualized stakeholders of any sort) to provide a reality perspective for the design of a system. This is a companion to Alan Cooper's injunction to design systems for one user. Although this approach shows up more in the context of interaction design and user-interface development, it strikes me that it is meaningful for the entire system-development life cycle and for the cycle of improvement that is envisioned for a product progression. Comments: Post a Comment Like It Or Not, We're In This Together -- The Software Improvement Cycle
Burningbird » When Open Source is Like Bad Sex This find on Scoble's Link Blog raises some important concerns about the dynamic between users and open-source developers (among all other kinds), and about how the cycle of improvement (I am becoming enamored of that Deming phrase) involves users and developers together. I'd say the point is that developers who don't cherish and embrace the participating user have a problem on their hands. Comments: Post a Comment Demos - Catalogue - The Pro-Am RevolutionDemos - Catalogue - The Pro-Am Revolution. This is the Demos open-access page for the Charles Leadbeater and Paul Miller book, The Pro-Am Revolution: How enthusiasts are changing our economy and society. Comments: Post a Comment |
|
|
You are navigating the Blunder Dome |
template created 2004-06-17-20:01 -0700 (pdt)
by orcmid |